探索我國「傳播媒體內容管制規範之價值體系」－ 法學方法與傳播研究接軌的問題
Searching for "Value System in Content Regulation of the Media" in Taiwan: Methodological Problematic in Combining Legal and Communication Research

石世豪
Shyr, Howard S. H.

傳播媒體法律規範的研究，究竟是否「專屬」於傳統法學研究的範疇，抑或是傳播研究領域內的「特殊」議題，甚至，因而不適用歷來法學研究的方法？本篇文字，根據作者參與「傳播媒體內容管制規範之價值體系」研借所遭遇的相關方法（論）問題為例，嘗試探索上述「跨科際整合」觀念的實踐意涵。整理得出以下幾個方法（論）上的挑戰：（一）研究題材與研究方法的『異質性』（二）「質」與「量」的方法如何啣接（三）如何觀察或評價本地實踐活動（四）學科對話的基礎何在？

Does the research of media regulation norms - like legal issues in the other domains - exclusively fall into the field of traditional legal studies? Or, rather constitute those studies contemplated by communication researchers a specialized regime within their discipline and thus can justify marginalizing every legal method in this respect? The author documents some methodological problems that he has experienced in the project "Value System in Content Regulation of the Media". After exposing some underlying weaknesses and shortage of inter-disciplinary co-operation he then categorizes related urging methodological challenges in four groups: (1) overcoming the "heterogeneity" of materials and methods, (2) combination of quality- and quantity-orientated methods, (3) critical stances for observing the domestic activities, and (4) academic basis for inter-disciplinary dialogues.

方法論，跨科際，經驗研究，價值理論，法規範，傳播活動，媒體管制，法律解釋，本土化

methodology，interdisciplinary，empirical research，value theories，legal norms，communication activities，media regulation，legal interpretation

已授權

探索我國「傳播媒體內容管制規範之價值體系」－ 法學方法與傳播研究接軌的問題.pdf