本研究探討了 2015 年台灣與中國大陸主流報紙中基因改造食品新聞框架的相同點與不同點。通過內容分析法對台灣四大報和大陸主流報紙在 2015 年的有關基因改造食品的新聞進行了框架整合。研究發現，在基改食品的框架中，安全風險框架最集中，都很關注食品安全與健康；大陸的推廣政策較多，兩岸的限制政策側重不同。台灣比大陸更強調非基改食品。台灣的報導更加貼近生活，而大陸報導多為宏觀。

This study examines the coherence and difference between frames of 2015 Taiwan and China mainstream newspapers in genetically modified food(GMOS) news. Through the content analysis method, we apply the integrated framing analysis to evaluate the news of GMO from Taiwan and China mainstream newspapers in 2015. The study found that the frame of reports centralized on the safety risk issue. Conclusively, both mainstream newspapers of Taiwan and China have a tendency on caring food safety and health issue. However, two of them have identical variance in restrictions regarding GMOs. The news in China are reported from a macroscopic view; moreover, the Chinese government favorites policies which promote genetically modified food. In contrast, the news report from Taiwan mainly focus on non-genetically modified food in daily life.