認同的迷失既是恐怖主義的主要肇因，也是中國大陸和台灣的共同困惑。本研究從陸台兩地媒體對中國恐怖主義事件的新聞再現切入，探討特殊認同時空中的特殊認同議題。採內容分析、框架論述、詞頻統計混和式研究法，對111則新聞樣本進行認同包裹和新聞框架雙重編碼分析，發現新聞再現勾連出的現狀是認同與對峙並存。具體表現為無條件認同（霸權支配）、批判式認同（折衷論述）和批判式不認同（抗爭論述）等三個認同包裹，以及「穩定－打擊」、「認同－分離」、「宣傳－動員」、「同胞－同情」、「批判－治理」、「暴力－陰謀」、「批判－對話」等七種新聞框架。本研究還重新定義恐怖主義，勾勒恐怖主義事件生長週期。

Lost of identity is not only a leading cause of terrorism, but also a common perplex of Mainland China and Taiwan. Cutting into the research by the news representation of Chinese terrorism incidents, this paper discusses a special identity issue in a special identity history. This paper adopts mix methods, which are constructed by content analysis, framing discourses and frequency statistics. 111 related news are selected and doubly-coded into both “identity package” and “news framing”. The results show that the news representation inter-connect with the coexisting identity and confrontation between Mainland China and Taiwan. To handle this issue, the embedment of into "unconditional approval" (hegemonic domination), "critical identity" (compromise discourse) and "critical disagree" (protest discourse) identity package might deduced to seven contrasting framings, which include "stability & struggle", "identity & segregation", "propaganda & mobilization", "Compatriots & sympathy", "critique & governance", "violence & Conspiracy" and " critique & dialogue" framing. Besides, this paper, drawing on redefining “terrorism”, also endeavors to outline the growth period of terrorism incidents.